|
“O
house of Israel, cannot I do with you as
this potter? saith Yahweh. Behold, as the
clay
is
in the potter’s hand, so are ye in Mine
hand, O house of Israel” (Jer 18:6)
The Creation narrative
given through Moses describes the formation
of man in these terms:
“Yahweh Elohim formed
man of the dust of the ground, and breathed
into his nostrils the breath of life; and
man became a living soul” (Gen 2:7).
So, we find that
there were distinct stages in the bringing
into existence of a living, breathing man.
Firstly, as a potter forms clay into an
image suitable for his purpose, the elohic
hands formed man from the 3 day old dust
of the ground. Then, into that organised
clay form, the ruach chayim, or breath of
lives was exhaled, causing that earth-man
to become a ‘living soul’. Not an ‘immortal
soul’, as some would have us believe, but
a ‘living soul,’ styled by the Apostle,
a ‘natural body,’ as distinct from a ‘spiritual
body’:
“There is a natural
body, and there is a spiritual body. And
so it is written, the first man Adam was
made a living soul; the last Adam was made
a quickening spirit … the first man is of
the earth, earthy; the second man is the
Lord from heaven. As is the earthy, such
are they also that are earthy: and as is
the heavenly, such also are they that are
heavenly. And as we have borne the image
of the earthy, we shall also bear the image
of the heavenly” (1Cor 15:44-49).
We then, in the natural
state of things bear the ‘image’ of Adam
(cp Gen 5:3), in possessing “earthy” bodies,
natural bodies ultimately derived from the
dust of the ground. And whether or not ‘in
the twinkling of an eye’ we shall be made
incorruptible, bearing the ‘image of the
heavenly’, entirely depends upon how we
make use of the things in this life – and
the deeds performed in the natural body.
Even as it is written: “we must all appear
before the judgement seat of Christ; that
every one may receive the things done in
his body, according to that he hath done,
whether it be good or bad” (2Cor 5:10).
Our ultimate destiny; whether it be to perish
for ever, having been rejected by the Righteous
Judge, or whether it be to bear the image
of the heavenly in having our mortal frames
transformed to become like unto his most
glorious body (Phil 3:21), is governed by
the manner of our conduct in this life.
So it is, that use and development of the
natural body, in this sense, forms the basis
for the heavenly; if it is used in accordance
with the Creator’s wishes, He will give
it that necessary transformation.
THE
POTTER’S PURPOSE
All of mankind being
but dust, as clay before the Great Potter,
it so pleases him to fulfil his purpose
by dredging out of the mire of humanity
individuals who might be so moulded as to
be made suitable vessels for the manifestation
of His Glory. And who are those selected
to complain, or resist? Thus, the Apostle
enquired: “Shall the thing formed say to
Him that formed it, Why hast thou made me
thus? Hath not the potter power over the
clay, of the same lump to make one vessel
unto honour, and another unto dishonour?”
(Rom 9:20,21). Out of one lump, one race
of men, the Great Potter has power to make
both vessels to honour, and also to dishonour.
Those who prove themselves to be amenable
to His Purpose, being malleable in His Hand
to become honourable vessels, and others
who harden themselves before Him, refusing
to be shaped according to His Pleasure.
This latter class,
as illustrated in the case of Pharoah, also
become vessels suitable for the exhibition
of Divine Glory, albeit being vessels of
dishonour. Refusing to become honourable,
their fleshly resistance is used by the
Divine Hand to bring about their destruction
in the Day of Wrath - thus enabling Divine
Power to be displayed in judicial manifestation.
Accordingly, “the Scripture saith unto Pharoah,
Even for this same purpose have I raised
thee up, that I might shew my power in thee,
and that my Name might be declared throughout
all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on
whom He will have mercy, and whom he will,
he hardeneth … what if God, willing to shew
his wrath, and to make his power known,
endured with longsuffering the vessels of
wrath fitted to destruction: and that He
might make known the riches of his glory
on the vessels of mercy, which He had afore
prepared unto glory, even us, whom He hath
called, not of the Jews only, but also of
the Gentiles:” (Rom 9:22-24).
Pharaoh was endured
with longsuffering, in order that the riches
of the Father’s Glory might be bestowed
upon the vessels of mercy, and be mightily
manifested in their deliverance. And those
vessels which will be filled with glory
in the Age to come, are those who do not
become hardened in the Divine Hand, but
who permit themselves to become so developed,
moulded and shaped as He Pleases. These
are those who do not resist the forces and
pressures exerted in order to form the necessary
shape – and those pressures will duly come,
for without them, the selected clay-man
cannot be moulded: “we must through much
pressure (Greek) enter into the kingdom
of God” (Acts 14:22), is the Spirit’s testimony,
and that Divinely regulated pressure is
designed to form us into vessels of splendour
“meet for the master’s use, and prepared
unto every good work” (2Tim 2:21).
ISRAEL
AS CLAY IN THE DIVINE HAND
Israel were taken
out from Egypt, for such a purpose; yet
they refused to comply. Rather preferring
the abominations of the nations, they challenged
the Potter’s right and authority to make
vessels out of them according to His Will.
Thus, the prophet gave the rebuke: “Woe
unto him that striveth with his Maker! Let
the potsherd strive with the potsherds of
the earth. Shall the clay say to him that
fashioneth it, “What makest thou?” Or thy
work, “He hath no hands?” (Is 45:9)
Again, the word of
Yahweh came through Jeremiah, saying:
“O house of Israel,
cannot I do with you as this potter? Saith
Yahweh. Behold, as the clay is in the potter’s
hand, so are ye in Mine hand, O house of
Israel. At what instant I shall speak concerning
a nation, and concerning a kingdom to pluck
up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;
if that nation, against whom I have pronounced,
turn from their evil, I will repent of the
evil that I thought to do unto them. And
at what instant I shall speak concerning
a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build
and to plant it; if it do evil in my sight,
that it obey not my voice, then I will repent
of the good wherewith I said I would benefit
them” (Jer 18:6-10).
The latter part of
this verse, to do with the Almighty altering
an intended course of action in response
to human repentance or rebellion, is often
taken out of it’s context. A most remarkable
instance of this is in the June 2001 issue
of Endeavour, where these words are used
in an attempt to support the notion that
the accomplishment of the Father’s promises
is conditional, being dependent upon human
obedience. Here, the editor takes issue
with the present writer (albeit in a slightly
different capacity), on a particular point
to do with this, presenting us with what
he feels to be a difficulty, and claiming
that we “seem to be totally unprepared to
wrestle with this problem.”
A
“PROBLEM” PRESENTED TO US
The “problem,” with
which the editor supposes we need to wrestle,
is how we can claim that the Father’s promises
are sure and certain, in the light of such
words as those of Jeremiah. Accordingly,
he claims in another place in the same magazine:
“in the OT first,
it is made abundantly clear that prophecies
are generally conditional even when it does
not explicitly say so. Jeremiah 18 explains
this in simple language” (p 10).
In fact, this same
article even goes on to categorically dismiss
certain parts of the prophetic word as not
ever coming to pass, such as the latter
chapters of Ezekiel:
“it no longer makes
good sense to maintain that since God promised
a new temple with associated animal sacrifices
through Ezekiel and that this has never
to our knowledge been fulfilled that it
must therefore still remain to be fulfilled
in any literal sense in the future. What
was promised to God’s people through Ezekiel
was appropriate to them in OT circumstances
but is no longer so to us after the coming
of Jesus. This is a perfect example of the
principle explained in Jeremiah 18. God
is free to change his mind … If this leaves
us with a problem of how to deal with apparently
unfulfilled promises then that is our problem
and not God’s” (p 10).
This “problem” pertaining
to man, but not to God is quite a problem
indeed – a far greater one than the Editor
claims we are not prepared to ‘wrestle with’.
In his magazine, the editor poses two “problems”,
one for us, and one for himself, and his
fellow writers. The “problem” for us, is
how to reconcile a belief in the certainty,
and unchanging nature of the Father’s promises
with Jeremiah 18. The problem for Endeavour
(by ‘us,’ we assume the Editor refers to
himself and his fellow writers), is to explain
how it is that the Father has left certain
promises on record which, it is claimed,
He has no intention to fulfil. To our mind,
that is an insurmountable difficulty, and
the Editor is quite right to recognise that
it is his problem, and not God’s, as it
is a problem of his own devising, and not
God’s, as we shall duly demonstrate.
The editor is also
quite right to say that we are “totally
unprepared to wrestle with” the ‘problem’
he presents us with. That is perfectly true,
because we do not regard it as a problem
which requires to be wrestled with - it’s
solution is easy, and very basic indeed.
The answer is instantly seen when it is
recognised that the editor is taking Jeremiah’s
words far away from their context – which
is not to do with the dependability/certainty
or otherwise of the Father’s promises, but
is rather to do with a Potter seeking to
mould nations/peoples, as clay under expertly
guided pressure into vessels suitable for
His Use.
The Potter has a
Purpose, and He has graciously condescended
to reveal that purpose unto those who have
ears to hear. And He requires Nations to
conform to His requirements – either to
turn from iniquity, or to remain righteous.
If a Nation refuses to turn from it’s iniquity,
as a potter squashes up the clay, even so
the Creator will execute His judgements
upon that Nation. If they do turn under
the pressure brought to bear upon them by
hearing the prophetic testimony, the nation
will be spared those judgements - the example
of Nineveh being a case in point. But either
way, whether they make themselves vessels
to honour, or to dishonour, His Power will
be made known, whether it be in benevolent,
or judicial manifestation..
Accordingly, if a
nation turns from conformity to the Potter’s
guiding Hand, to become hardened against
Him – it will be squashed up, and the clay
re-moulded as the Potter sees fit. Either
way, the Potter will be glorified, and His
Purpose to make honourable vessels will
be accomplished. The promises of the Father
are steadfast and sure - the only “conditional”
element associated with them, is not whether
or not they will take place at all, as Endeavour
falsely claims, but whether or not individuals
will have a part with them. Those who refuse
to be developed into honourable vessels
will not by any means affect the Potter’s
purpose to form an array of such vessels;
He will merely squash them up, and continue
His work. They will not be amongst that
splendid array - but an array there shall
surely be!
THE
CERTAINTY OF THE FATHER’S PROMISES
This being so, Jeremiah’s
words do not comprise a declaration that
“that prophecies are generally conditional
even when it does not explicitly say so,”
but is dealing with a specific case aspect
of things, to do with the Father’s refusal
to destroy a repentant people (as in the
case of Nineveh in the days of Jonah) -
or refusal to bless an unrepentant people
- and this is quite in Harmony with both
his stated Character, and Purpose. Repentance
is an essential prerequisite to inheriting
the promises. No repentance does not frustrate
the promises - it merely excludes the ungodly
from them. To conclude that because the
threatened destruction of a people was averted
by their repentance, that therefore all
prophecy is of such a nature as that it
may or may not come to pass is such a wild
and unfounded generalisation that it is
difficult to treat it seriously.
It is a fundamental
principle stated in both the Old and New
Testaments that the Father is unchanging.
Thus, Malachi spake to Israel of old: “I
am Yahweh, I change not; therefore ye sons
of Jacob are not consumed” (Mal 3:6). And
similarly, the Spirit through James spake
to those in dispersion: “every good gift
and every perfect gift is from above, and
cometh down from the Father of lights with
whom there is no variableness, neither shadow
of turning” (Jas 1:17).
There is no ‘variableness’
with him with whom we have to do, for of
himself he states “I change not.” By contrast
to man, who is ever-changing, and notoriously
unreliable, Yahweh does not “turn” away
His light-stream of warmth and comfort,
leaving his children in the shadows. He
is faithful to perform that which He has
promised. Thus, Moses encouraged Israel:
“Know therefore that
Yahweh thy Elohim, he is Elohim, the faithful
El, which keepeth covenant and mercy with
them that love him and keep his commandments
to a thousand generations; and repayeth
them that hate him to their face, to destroy
them” (Deut 7:9-10).
And again, reiterating
the same point, Paul encouraged the separated
ones at Corinth:
“God is faithful,
by whom ye were called unto the fellowship
of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord” (1 Cor
1:9).
“God is faithful.”
With him, there is no “variableness”. He
is Yahweh - he changes not. He keeps covenant
and mercy - and the certainty of His Own
faithfulness is a guarantee of this fact.
And so the promises He made to the Fathers
of old; the “exceeding great and precious
promises” (2Pet 1:4) made to those who are
Abrahams’ seed through faith are absolutely
immutable:
“When God made promise
to Abraham, because He could sware by no
greater, He sware by Himself … God, willing
more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of
promise the immutability of His counsel,
confirmed it by an oath: that by two immutable
things, in which it was impossible for God
to lie, we might have strong consolation,
who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon
the hope set before us” (Heb 6:13-18).
So then, whereas
the Endeavour editor claims that “prophecies
are generally conditional” and whereas he
states concerning “the Endeavour error that
God’s promises are conditional’ this ‘error’
we freely admit to …” (p 56), we find that
the Inspired penman through whom the voice
of the Spirit came just does not agree at
all, other than to confirm that the notion
is indeed an “error”. The Testimony of the
Word is that the counsel of the Father,
expressed in promises to the Patriarchs
and elaborated in prophetic exposition,
is immutable, being confirmed by “two immutable
things”. And this being the case, we can
trust in the prophecies and promises which
Yahweh has revealed. They will surely come
to pass - because Yahweh has declared them,
and it is written: “my word that goeth forth
out of my mouth: it shall not return unto
me void, but shall accomplish that which
I please, and it shall prosper in that whereunto
I sent it” (Is 55:11). Any who teach that
the Word shall indeed return void; empty
and unfulfilled are indeed creating a problem
- and as the Editor recognises, that problem
is a serious one, and it is his, and not
God’s. Neither is it a problem for any who
trust in the certainty of the revealed Word;
only for those who sweep aside whole chapters
of the holy writ, such as the latter part
of Ezekiel, under the faithless assumption
that they will not come to pass in the manner
decreed by the Almighty.
VESSELS
TO BE BROKEN
The Kingdom of Judah,
by Jeremiahs’ day, had degenerated to such
a degree that the situation was irredeemable
(cp 2Chron 36:16). The pot had hardened
itself to such an extent in the Great Potter’s
hand, that it couldn’t even be re-moulded;
it had to be shattered under the judgements
of Yahweh; only then would the people come
to submit themselves to Him. Accordingly,
Jeremiah was commanded:
“Thus saith Yahweh,
“Go and get a potter’s earthen bottle, and
take of the ancients of the people, and
of the ancients of the priests, and go forth
unto the valley of the son of Hinnom … and
proclaim there the words that I shall tell
thee … Then shalt thou break the bottle
in the sight of the men that go with thee,
and shalt say unto them, Thus saith Yahweh
of hosts: Even so will I break this people
and this city, as one breaketh a potter’s
vessel, that cannot be made whole again:
and they shall bury them in Tophet, till
there be no place to bury” (see Jer 19:1-13)
By this means, would
the power of Yahweh be made known; in the
shattering of the people that refused to
submit to him. Indeed, we find that a similar
situation will subsist when the Master comes
to exercise his dominion over all the earth.
Some nations will readily submit (cp Ps
72:10, Is 60:9), but others will harden
themselves, bringing destruction upon themselves
in daring to wage war upon the enthroned
Lamb:
“the kings of the
earth set themselves together against Yahweh,
and against his Messiah, saying, Let us
cast away their bonds from us. He that sitteth
in the heavens shall laugh: The Lord shall
have them in derision Then shall he speak
unto them in his wrath, and vex them … Yahweh
hath said unto me, Thou art my son; this
day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and
I shall give thee the heathen for thine
inheritance, and the uttermost parts of
the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt
break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt
dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.”
(Ps 2:2-9).
Thus showing themselves
to be vessels of dishonour, with their hearts
as hardened as Pharaoh’s of old, these peoples
will present themselves to be suitable only
for destruction at the hand of Yahweh’s
anointed King. Here is a promise, which
stands sure and certain; it shall come to
pass in due time; and the question remains
for us to decide for ourselves - are we
going to submit ourselves to the pressures
and trials that Yahweh brings upon us to
develop us for His Purpose? Or are we going
to stiffen ourselves in His hand, being
disbelieving that he will surely bring to
pass that which he has decreed? The choice
is ours, and our eternal future depends
on how we respond.
Chris
Maddocks
|